tags
adorno amy de'ath andrew marvell arduity atemwende Better than language bloody sunday caroline bergvall celan charles olson clavics david jones derrida Difficult poetry dionysus crucified documentary poetry Edmund Spenser elizabeth bishop ezra pound field notes francesca lisette geoffrey hill Geoffrey Hll geology george herbert heidegger holocaust in parenthesis jacques derrida jeremy prynne j h prynne joe luna john matthias john skelton jonty tiplady kazoo dreamboats keston sutherland love III martin buber martin heidegger maurice blanchot maximus poems mental ears and poetic work neil pattison night office odi barbare paul celan paul muldoon pierre joris poem poetic thought poetry preferences prynne Reitha Pattison Samuel Beckett simon jarvis slow light streak willing entourage artesian stress position sub songs the anathemata the faerie queene the meridian the odes to TL61P the triumph of love the unconditional Timothy Thornton to pollen trigons ulster vanessa place wordsworth writing wrong poetrycategories
art audio books covid-19 cultural criticism david jones economics family film geography history interviews literary criticism literature mental health mythology neuroscience performance philosophy photography poem poetics poetry political science politics sociology theology translation Uncategorized web scienceBlogroll
language
literature
photography
poetics
poetry
writing
search bebrowed
” People come genuinely but mistakenly to believe that they had witnessed something”
This entry was posted in history, poem, poetry, politics and tagged bernard mcguigan, bloody sunday, evidence, poem, saville inquiry, witness. Bookmark the permalink.
My word … this is forceful … and fair enough, the subject merits that uncompromising treatment. I make a guess that the broken sentences have been taken from actual witness statements to the Saville Inquiry, but there is sensitivity and skill in the assembly of the parts, the repetition, the overlays and gaps.
I rather the like the opening : starting with a conjunction in lower case, to bring the reader in with a shock at a point where preliminaries have been concluded and the horror begins.
And the closing line equally : the recollections won’t stop repeating, can’t conclude, don’t …
John,
I’m pleased that you like this, it’s something that I cant seem to get out of my system. Most of the sentences are taken from witness statements, the title is a particularly fatuous observation made by Saville as well and there are also definitions of ‘explode’ and ‘skip’ from the OED. I’m now trying to wean myself off (again) Ulster and move on to archives new…